Submission to the review of Australian higher education
ثبت نشده
چکیده
The paper takes as its starting point the observation in the discussion paper that higher education can enhance social inclusion and reduce social and economic disadvantage by deepening our understanding of health and social issues and by providing access to higher levels of learning to people from all backgrounds (Commonwealth of Australia, 2008b: 1). The paper argues that the current Australian policy on equity in higher education, which is based on A fair chance for all (DEET, 1990), continues to be important for national policy, evaluation and intervention. However, it has gaps and limitations when applied to institutions and their regions. While higher education has hardly featured in social inclusion policy in Australia or overseas, social inclusion offers a useful framework for structuring and evaluating institutions’ contribution to equity.
منابع مشابه
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Developing a Framework for Teaching and Learning Standards in Australian Higher Education and the role of TEQSA Discussion Paper – University of Sydney
The University of Sydney is pleased to provide some initial thoughts in response to the Developing a Framework for Teaching and Learning Standards in Australian Higher Education and the Role of TEQSA Discussion Paper, released for comment by the Interim TEQSA Commission in June 2011. Our comments are intended to complement the submission provided by the Group of Eight universities, which we end...
متن کاملAn individual submission on the overview paper "Higher Education at the Crossroads"
Statement concerning this submission This submission is particularly concerned with the fundamental disciplines, especially mathematics and statistics, and their place within the Australian university system. Consideration of the situation of these disciplines with the university system leads to more general issues, including attitudes to research, cross-subsidisation, the objectives of teachin...
متن کاملConcern on the removal an indicator for teaching quality
The Council of Australian Directors of Academic Development (CADAD) welcomes the opportunity to make this submission in response to the discussion paper, Development of Performance Measurement Instruments in Higher Education. While this is a response to one of the three papers released concurrently by DEEWR, it may be read alongside the discussion papers, Assessment of Generic Skills and Review...
متن کاملبررسی سامانههای تحت وب عرضه و داوری مقالات از نظر قابلیتهای نقش نویسنده در نشریات مصوب وزارت بهداشت
Background and Aim: Online submission and peer review systems are formal channels of communication among authors, journal editorial boards, and reviewers. The review process starts after authors submit their manuscripts. The aim of this study is to examine the online article submission and peer review systems in terms of the capability in medical journals of Iranian Ministry of Health, and Medi...
متن کاملSystem Factors Influencing the Australian Nurses' Evidence-based Clinical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Recent Studies
Background: There is growing attention to evidence-based practice in Australian clinical contexts and nursing literature. Recent research explores the dimensions of evidence-based practice; however, the implementation of evidence-based clinical decision making has been identified as a cumbersome process. Aim: This study aimed to review the literature syst...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008